For the past few months, I’ve kept my successes in business and skills in business communications separate from game. I knew that there were stark similarities, but also knew that there were enough differences to warrant keeping the two separate. Moreover, there were skillsets that I used during business communications that were actually counter-productive to game (i.e. being too serious, sounding too professional).
Now that I’ve gotten better, I’ve started to re-explore my business communications skills for overlap. Through thinking about it, I’ve found a few key skillsets which I believe can be safely transferred over to game. The skillsets are things I have worked on extensively for corporate recruiting, and became quite good at, and realize that these are skillsets which can be paralleled in game.
Speaking Slowly: When I first started corporate recruiting 2 years ago, one of my biggest issues was speaking too quickly – it reached a point where I would even write “slow down” on my hand before an interview, in an attempt to slow my speech down. Even then, speed was still a problem… Then, about a year ago, the problem started to improve, and I started to get really good at controlling the speed of my speech.
By the time the most recent recruiting season came around 6 months ago, I had mastered speaking slowly during the interview, and it was something I didn’t really have to think about. In fact, when I would teach other people preparing for corporate recruiting, speaking slowly was one of the first things I would fix… and it usually made a significant improvement.
After talking to Peter Sheriff in
It helps to be in
Mental Imaging: I got really good at mentally imagining my saying something in an interview, and then saying it in almost exactly the same way I had pictured it. On a broader scale, I got really good at picturing myself interviewing really well, and then replicating that in real life when the actual interview came.
When I first started corporate recruiting though, that’s not a skillset I had. In fact, when I would imagine myself saying something, when I actually went to say it, it was actually harder to do so! It was almost as though I was became self-conscious of the fact that I had mentally pictured something and was trying to replicate that (I used to think “who does that?? that’s weird.” That thought process makes absolutely no sense, but it is how I felt at the time.
It’s not something I consciously worked on, but I realized when I got really good at corporate recruiting, a large part of my success is that I got really good at picturing myself saying something, and then saying it pretty closely to how I had pictured it.
This type of imagining is mentioned extensively in Psycho Cybernetics, and is something I never really realized I did until I read the book. I would reckon that if I can accomplish the same kind of imagining to my sets, I’d be able to deliver routines and words better. Picture it, then do it. Easier said than done, but I have gotten good at it… just in a different setting than game.
Self-Image: This one also draws directly for Psycho Cybernetics. Through successful reference experiences, mentors and knowledge, I developed a rock-solid self image of being an absolute successful business person. I held the image that I was confident, could handle myself and was fully capable. Holding this image provided me with the actual confidence to succeed and is the exact kind of self-image that needs to be worked on for my game.
While reading psycho-cybernetics, I was able to compartmentalize 4 types of self-images that I have – the academic, the corporate executive, the social friend and the sexual being. I’ve got the first two down, the 3rd one 70% there and need to really work on just the last one.
Absolute Confidence: As I got better at corporate recruiting, I started to feel that I was better than everyone else. Literally everyone else – kids from Wharton, NYE, Virginia... wherever. I knew that many were smarter, some were better with numbers, but that at the end of the day, I understood the game better and knew how to interview better.
This confidence transcended all: prestige of schools, race of the candidates, height, looks, you name it. How awesome would it be to have this same kind of rock solid confidence in my ability with game? It’s obviously not perfectly there yet, but I have experience achieving this type of confidence in another field – something which in itself should have some transferable benefit while developing inner game for game.
This confidence was grown organically as I naturally got better, and I suspect similar things will happen with game. If I can expedite the process though, by realizing what I went through with corporate recruiting, it would make things all the better.